All right--I admit it. The party of Thomas Jefferson blew it. In 2008, it looked like it would transform the nation. Money filled their coffers; voters of all ages and races turned out in unbelievable numbers with unbridled exuberance. The new president would be post-partisan and post-racial. A filibuster-proof majority was sent to the Senate. And now, November 1,2010, twenty-four hours before the mid-terms, all that feeling is gone. The Democratic domination in 2008 has resulted in a wave of lethargy and the sense of unfulfilled expectations.
What caused this? The answers would fill a book and this is just a blog post. But the short list would include the partisan leadership in both houses of congress on both sides. There wasn't REAL leadership. Just business same as ever and post-partisanship be damned. The R's just said "NO" ; the D's never pushed the president's agenda.
So it's time to vote again. In my state, the choices are pathetic. No policy differences between the candidates for Congress. If you didn't mark "D" or "R" beside their names you couldn't tell which was which. For governor there are two women (we'll get our first female governor): one is tarred with allegations of her own corruption, the other tarred with the corruption in the present administration that caused our present governor to turn down a cabinet post. Nice choice there.......
Normally, I might not even to bother to vote in this kind of an election. But I am going to, and I am voting to support what I voted for in 2008----CHANGE. Not Tea Party or Glen Beck B.S. but the change we need. The change Obama promised. Let's look at the record:
End of Partisanship----didn't happen, not because the president flubbed it but because the Republicans ignored the gestures and Reid and Pelosi did not push his agenda nor did they make the kind of attempts at reaching across the aisle that the president did.
Health Care Reform---again, Congress dropped the ball and gutted what could have been one of the defining pieces of legislation in the 21st Century. There's much good in it and it deserves to be revisited and improved. Repeal is moving backwards. And a reminder to those sign holders--if the government took its hands off of "your" Medicare, there wouldn't be any Medicare--it's a government program, you fools!!!
WAR--"huh, good Gawd y'all, what is it good for?"(Edwin Starr) Obama has fulfilled his promise to wind down Bush's war of choice in Iraq. He has escalated the effort in Afghanistan; unfortunately, because of the mis-begotten Iraq conflict, it's too late to destroy Al-Qaeda's structure, which has moved to Pakistan and Yemen. But he has promised an end there as well in 2011. Guantanamo needs to be closed but I think congress may need to be involved there to craft legislation to legally detain or try the terrorist suspects outside the present legal strictures. Seems with terrorism the right to presumed innocence and illegal seizure, among others, are not applicable.
The Economy----Obama's policies probably helped avoid a repeat of the Great Depression. Unfortunately, they did not go far enough to stimulate rapid growth and alleviate the painful job losses that ALWAYS follow financial melt-downs. Read any economic history and you will understand this fact. What the nation is going through is nothing new. And cutting the deficit and taxes will NOT help---these policies are shown to worsen the effects of the crisis and prolong recovery. Ask Japan--do we want a lost decade of economic stagnation and deflation like they had/are having??
So please go to the polls tomorrow, November 2nd, and vote with intelligence--not with sloganeering or nice catch-phrases dancing in your head. Barack Obama was elected to provide change. He thought he had allies in congress but political gamesmanship trumped the post-partisan era Obama attempted to introduce. Let's use these mid-terms to send people to Washington who will help the president fulfill the dreams we all voted for two years ago.
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Monday, November 1, 2010
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Some Saturday Morning Random
Over the top---------was sent this video of a politician's speech---
The comment was that the sender wasn't paying attention to how over the top some politics had gotten. My suggestion is to read Gail Collins in the NY Times---this is a link to today's post: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/11/opinion/11collins.html?hp
I would recommend regular reading of her column because Gail has pretty consistently pointed out many of the absurdities and gaffes in this year's election campaigns. It's done with some humor and both sides have been the subject of her barbs.
As for the economy, one word----STIMULUS. More is needed. Don't just take the word of Paul Krugman, Nobel laureate in economics. Read this leader from The Economist magazine dated Sept. 2, 2010:
http://www.economist.com/node/16943653?story_id=16943653
Interest rates are at or near zero. There's precious little that the central bank can do to get unemployment down and the economy rolling again. Real growth needs directional change from policy---it has to come from the politicians!!! You know, those people with no cajones because it's an election year-----god forbid we'd do anything constructive that might help THE PEOPLE..............so if you're a Democrat just try to be pandering and ingratiating so you can keep your seat; if you're a Republican just say NO. And please don't worry---the middle class won't come out to vote because they get the shaft either way.
As John Mellenkamp says---"Ain't that America, land of the free....little pink houses for you and me." Except we ain't got that guarantee no more thanks to the economic downturn and the lack of intestinal fortitude among our elected representatives.
The comment was that the sender wasn't paying attention to how over the top some politics had gotten. My suggestion is to read Gail Collins in the NY Times---this is a link to today's post: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/11/opinion/11collins.html?hp
I would recommend regular reading of her column because Gail has pretty consistently pointed out many of the absurdities and gaffes in this year's election campaigns. It's done with some humor and both sides have been the subject of her barbs.
As for the economy, one word----STIMULUS. More is needed. Don't just take the word of Paul Krugman, Nobel laureate in economics. Read this leader from The Economist magazine dated Sept. 2, 2010:
http://www.economist.com/node/16943653?story_id=16943653
Interest rates are at or near zero. There's precious little that the central bank can do to get unemployment down and the economy rolling again. Real growth needs directional change from policy---it has to come from the politicians!!! You know, those people with no cajones because it's an election year-----god forbid we'd do anything constructive that might help THE PEOPLE..............so if you're a Democrat just try to be pandering and ingratiating so you can keep your seat; if you're a Republican just say NO. And please don't worry---the middle class won't come out to vote because they get the shaft either way.
As John Mellenkamp says---"Ain't that America, land of the free....little pink houses for you and me." Except we ain't got that guarantee no more thanks to the economic downturn and the lack of intestinal fortitude among our elected representatives.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
About November
I've heard that one gets more conservative as one ages. Something about preserving one's own wealth rather than giving it to those more needy or less able to generate wealth. Worse yet---giving it to the government in the form of taxes----horrors and shudders!!!!!!!
Maybe I'm bucking the trend but I find myself becoming more liberal in terms of social issues but still fairly conservative in fiscal matters. But I do believe that the primary function of government to protect its citizens. You'll get no argument from me that there is a lot of waste in the government sector. But the recent remarks from the co-chair of the commission studying the deficit and social security to lessen the government stake are just so wrong-headed I could spit. As I recall, in the second term of the last Republican president there was a similar push to privatize retirement savings and wind down Social Security. Imagine if it had happened-----how much did your 401-K lose in 2007-2009----less than the Dow, then congratulations; more---then how many years did it add before you can retire---or even, can you retire without Social Security???
I have less than 65 days until I retire. I'm working my way through funding options so I can continue to feed the oh-so-dearly-loved Pirate Dogs, with some food also available for the humans in the household. Since I can collect S.S. at 62, this is going to work. The benefits are reduced but it will be do-able and actually fairly comfortable. But if the previous administration had its way, my employer would be stuck with an employee on the verge of burn out for another six or seven years, not to mention my defined benefit, i.e., pension plan, income would suffer. If I retired at 66 or 67, I would lose several years of good commission income and actually be in WORSE financial shape than by retiring early. Sort of the opposite of what the demagogues of anti-government benefits preach.
Lots of pre-mid-term chatter about Obama the Muslim Socialist. One comment---listen with your ears, process the information with your brains, and give the sitting president the support he deserves. I hated the bail-outs but 1) they were enacted by the Republicans and 2) they worked because of the policies and decisions of Barack Obama. Don't take the word of a blogger and Pirate Dog lover. Follow this link to The Economist editorial leader from the 8/21-8/27/2010 edition. Read it, think about it, and you'll realize it's true. Right now the no-brainers have the floor and the screeching is deafening. Please don't let it deprive you of your right to a choice come November as it has deprived Alaska of its incumbent senator or KY of a real chance for change. I don't hear policies or solutions coming from the talk-show hosts or the opposition leaders---just noise and obstruction.
November is the first referendum we have on the decisions we made in 2008. Were it not for politics as usual in Congress and the "Just Say NO" clique, we might even have unemployment down to a sustainable level and a real recovery in progress. Don't blow the November mid-terms. Let's give our leaders the chance to finish cleaning up the Bushian nightmare. Don't give your vote to those who would make us relive it.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
cable news,
congress,
conservatives,
deficits,
economy,
Republicans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)